Klakerz moves to scumread...multiple scumreads, wants to vote a derp read anyway. He gives me and blab inactivity reads...onl nonvague comment us about an av...


God, not everyone can be scum.

 

Again, not a need. Curiosity.

Again, correlation does not mean causation or evidence. I asked a Day 1 question because I like to do so. That it's "underlying purpose" also happened to back up my opinion from my Qt is just happy coincidence.

The annoying fact that you think I skim threads is stupid. I read every post, regardless of what I respond to.

Case in point, your original attempt to lynch me or blab's insistence on a "real" read.

Everyone is trying to be super-duper serious on Day 1 within the first 24 hours no less. How in the world am I supposed to seriously analyze the things you're trying to push for?

You claim to run on evidence, but the problem is all your evidence is currently based on opinions and insight into meta that you've gleaned over the course of this game. Opinions =/= evidence. I'm waiting until after night 1 when we'll have a piece of quantifiable evidence to actually analyze.

You're pushing so hard to look town right now it hurts. Slow down before you give someone whiplash.

 

hmm I agree with Bill. You are not playing as you usually do when you are town. And your whole not being confident thing, suck it up. My last game was when we were OTP. >_>

So yeah felling suspicious of Lucky at the moment.

 

Riley, I come in two forms. Hard and harder. Get ready to go see the doctor. I push until people lynch my scumreads or I feel they are town.

Evidence is just something that tends to prove ir disprove the thing asserted. Meta is evidence. Trolling is evidence. The conclusion drawn from evidence is an opinion.

I didn't say you skimmed threads. I said you were intellectually lazy and unwilling to spply past knowledge and group dynamics to determine likely leaders. Instead you waste time on cats and dogs.

There is no need to divine who the leader is unless scum on day 1. You slight us for being serious but you too are being serious. Serious is good. RVS bad.

 

Hm. If RVS is bad, how are you tolerating Ika/Lyrium/Snowvon so well? I'd say they've been rvsing pretty hard.

 

@Citrus: Currently my scum reads are Atum, Snowvon and Vira. Riley is a derp, Lucky is not playing as he usually does when he is town. I never meant you are lurking, What I meant was I am not really confident about your comments of you or blab. I am leaning towards town at the moment. Also I have no idea what you meant in your 2nd last sentence

---------- Post automerged at 09:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 PM ----------

BAH I meant @Titus

 

No they haven't been. Snowvon's analysis has mirrored mine. In fact we posted some things that were similar within minutes of each other.

Lyrium has been active is scumhunting, following the gd discussion bc she claimed gd.

Ika is not rvsing at all. He seriously trolls. Hence his role shit.

---------- Post automerged at 09:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:01 AM ----------

Your only thing based on anything verifiable is a comment on Atum's av. Tone is hard to read.

 

Nice back track, but as you can see in.my post, where I quoted you, "when you can skim games," implying I did so.

I'm slighting you for pushing hard on inane things on Day 1 to look town.

Also, time is never wasted when furry friends are involved. I have a lot of things to learn, but thats not one of them.

 

Just woke up. So many pages to read. ;_;

Why would anyone post uselessly on purpose? If Riley were scum, he’d be trying to make good posts to look town. If he’s scum, his useless posting is on accident.

Mini Mafia 4, I think.

I read the other people null or town and don’t have anything to say about them as of yet. Scum reads more useful so people can know where I stand. I may come up with a list of town reads, but no point when it's so short.

Vote: Atum.

Still my biggest scum read, so I'll leave my vote on him.

 

Titus and everyone else, I want to take a closer look at fontisian\Vira interactions during pre-game. Something pinged me as off but due to the GD thing I overlooked it.

What is wrong with post #43 and post #45 and #58

Hint: W3

Fontisian asks Vira if she has any witch hunt experience in relations to exchanges in #37 - #40.

Since W3 is a famous as hell game, where Fonti was a one person witch army why does she need to ask if Vira has experience (P.S. Fonti you were perusing the thread while I was) when she played against Vira?

Why does Vira say she doesn't have experience with W3? Why does Fontisian seem to be trying to coach her with the "right answer?"

People from W3, feel free to chime in.

Riley, I'll get to you posts but really it comes down to my liking cats. At this point you might as well ask astrological signs and divine some nebulous data from that as well.

 

Sadness: nobody seems to care about my absense or lack of precense

Semi-troll Question: if im being town read does that mean i can afk the entire day and do nothing?

Random read update:

fonti: still can be scum, need more
lucky: dunno overall lazy to look
cirtus: needs more info
vira: prob scum
blab: fluffy town
lyrim: transparent town

---------- Post automerged at 11:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 AM ----------

new read:

font: moves up in scum reads after lyrims point (who ninjaed me)

 

I am confused why is that suspicious. There were 2 more WH games before WH3. Isn't fontsian asking Vira if she played in either of those?

 

Honestly, I forgot until about an hour ago. I asked at the time because Vira used language (narrowing down the priest) that implies either experience, a scum role, or both.

 

Explain that logic to me real slow.

 

nvm okay Vira played WH3 >_>

 

Vote Count 1.4 - up to #272
(8 to lynch, 10 for supermajority)

Atum (4): Bill Door, Rubicon, klackerz, Vira
Polysemous (3): Titus, Luckylee, ika
Titus (2): blab, Polysemous
Luckylee (1): Citrus
Citrus (1): Snowvon
Vira (1): fontisian
Snowvon (1): Riley Poole

Abstain (3): Atum, Lyrium

Day 1 ends here.

 

Snowvon, so far this looks like your town play. Pushing discussion with a tone that seems careless but isn't. I think it feels sort of like what Lyrium does with a less pressure. So lean town, but keep it up.

I think ika's town too, maybe moody at first, but he's given his reads and this seems like what I've seen him do, so I'm fairly confident.

That being said this is mostly meta and I've seen how well that's worked out so far.

@Vira: I'm your biggest scum read thus far, who else? Also how do you feel about Snowvon?

 

So let's go back to basics.

Everyone, answer:

1. Are you a witch? Yes, I am a witch or No, I am not a witch.
Not answering implies an admission of guilt.

2. Atum, there are four witches. Who is your biggest scum read out of everyone who's posted so far? Based on that who are there potential scum buddies?

3. Fontisian, give me something to work with.

4. Riley, if you received incontrovertible info that I was town, how does your list change?

Titus, I want to agree with you on several things. Or actually, I agree with you on several stuffs.

 

Answer: No im not a witch, I am this thing ------>:fire

role hint:

 

@Lyirum: Honestly, not much. You'd be top town but other than that, Snowvon is still my strongest scum read for doing so much parroting.