1. Hey Guest, welcome back to DLP

    As you can see, we've changed our look. We've migrated from vBulletin to the Xenforo forum system. There may be issues or missing functionality, if you find anything or have feedback, please check out the new Xenforo Migration Feedback forum.

    Our dark ("Dark Lord Potter") theme is under heavy development. We also have a light ("Light Lord Potter") theme for those happier with a light background and darker text.

    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Hey Guest! Are you any good at cooking? Got a favourite recipe that you love to cook or bring out to impress that special someone? Why not share it! A new forum called The Burrow has opened and it's all about homemaking!

Cursed Child Plotholes

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by RottedKarma, Jun 26, 2017.

  1. RottedKarma

    RottedKarma Squib

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2017
    Messages:
    15
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    High Score:
    0
    I haven't read Cursed Child in a while so my memory's a bit foggy. Though I remember that the plot felt rather choppy which is sure to leave one or two plotholes. Anyone know one?
     
  2. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    There were far more than one or two plotholes.

    1. Harry's scar.
    Harry's scar only hurt because it linked him to Voldemort due to the Horcrux. The Horcrux was destroyed in Deathly Hallows. Voldemort died in Deathly Hallows. Harry's scar hence had no reason to hurt, right? Well, it did.

    2. Cedric's character assassination.
    "Remember Cedric. Remember, if the time should come when you have to make a choice between what is right and what is easy, remember what happened to a boy who was good, and kind, and brave, because he strayed across the path of Lord Voldemort. Remember Cedric Diggory."
    That's what Dumbledore said in Goblet of Fire. Can you imagine Cedric becoming a Death Eater? Well, he did.

    3. Time turners.
    Fundamentally, how time-turners work has changed in Cursed Child. Their nature has changed so much that it directly contradicts Prisoner of Azkaban.

    4. Harry speaks parseltongue.
    See number 1. Same reasoning applies.

    5. Ron gives his nephew a love potion as a gift.
    Albus Potter was 14 at that time. Enough said.

    6. Hermione can't hide stuff.
    She hid the time turner in a book. A series of riddles solved by a teenager led to the discovery of the time turner. This is Hermione we're talking about. Why on earth would she hide a time turner in a bookcase? McGonagall said it best, “And in a bookcase. You kept it in a bookcase. It’s almost laughable.”

    7. Albus Potter makes out with his aunt.
    Repeatedly. What the actual fuck?

    That's off the top of my head. You can search for more if you'd like.
     
  3. ScottPress

    ScottPress The Horny Sovereign Prestige

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,593
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Holy Moose Empire
    High Score:
    1,826
    Wait what? Do tell, I never actually finished reading the scriptbook.
     
  4. CheddarTrek

    CheddarTrek Set Phasers to Melt Moderator DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,954
    Location:
    Mississippi
    I didn't actually read it, but I heard that Harry was startled/afraid of owls? Surely that can't be accurate. I suspect if anything an owl managed to surprise him, but regardless it seems pretty out of character.

    I should read it. I don't really want to, but I should. It's canon. Technically. ...more or less.
     
  5. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    At one point, Albus took polyjuice to turn himself into Ron. He happens upon Hermione and to escape, he decides to distract her by kissing her. He even went as far as to ask if she wanted to try for another baby or something. Don't remember exactly.

    You don't know the half of it. Harry's boggart is actually a pigeon. A fucking pigeon.
     
  6. ScottPress

    ScottPress The Horny Sovereign Prestige

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,593
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Holy Moose Empire
    High Score:
    1,826
    ...

    no comment

    DAO xover! Harry/Shale!
     
  7. Taure

    Taure Magical Core Enthusiast Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    948
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    High Score:
    13,152
    This one isn't the case, at least with respect to the "can't change the past" aspect. In PoA, "Closed loop time travel" is what happens when you use time-turners correctly, in accordance with Ministry guidance. But the very fact that Hermione was warned against changing the past shows that it is possible within the PoA canon. It's just a very bad idea.

    The Cursed Child timeturner is different in that it goes back further and returns you to the future rather than you having to live your way back to your original time, but this isn't really a plot hole given that the Cursed Child timeturner is explicitly said to be an upgrade. It's important to distinguish magical innovation from plot holes.
     
  8. Andrela

    Andrela Plot Bunny DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    4,179
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Silesia
    Now I want to go back in time and change history so that Cursed Child is never made.
     
  9. Atram Noctem

    Atram Noctem High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2015
    Messages:
    525
    @CheddarTrek, they were pigeons.

    Every second sentence in CC is a plot hole, there's no point in trying to list them all or make sense of them. Just one reading ruined my childhood. I suggest we all just collectively pretend that it never existed.
     
  10. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    Huh. Well, that was a gross oversimplification on my part. I haven't really read the material in years, so my memory's a bit foggy. Those are just the things that stood out to me the most. Thanks for the clarification anyways.
     
  11. Puzzled

    Puzzled Professor

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    476
    Dumbledore is hardly going to trash a dead kid in front of all his friends. "Sure, Cedric was pretty cool but if he was subjected to a calvacade of humiliations he might have made foolish choices that I'll now speculate on in order to ruin his memory." It's a pretty big character swing sure, but that's not the best argument for a plot hole in my mind.
     
  12. crimson sun06

    crimson sun06 Unspeakable

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2013
    Messages:
    742
    I dunno. Cedric turning death eater is wrong on just so many levels. This is the guy who was all about honor and fair-play. The guy who nearly threw away his chance at glory during the third task because it went against his principles.

    I mean sure people change, but damn, you turned the first significant death in the series, a death which affected the readers because of how much the character resonated with everyone, turn into... this.

    In short, saying that Cursed child is responsible for the character-assassination of one of the better liked characters in the series is no exaggeration.
     
  13. Toujourss Pur

    Toujourss Pur First Year

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Spain
    High Score:
    0
    Should the fact that they are able to see the Potter's house, which is under Fidelius, be counted as a plot hole or a weakness of the Fidelius itself? I mean, could it be that people that come from a point in time in which the Fidelius has already been broken or taken off be unaffected?
     
  14. CheddarTrek

    CheddarTrek Set Phasers to Melt Moderator DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,954
    Location:
    Mississippi
    Huh, well shit. I need to re-read whatever book that was (DH?). For some reason in my mind I thought that the charm broke (or was removed) at some point after Voldemort attacked the house. DH confirms it's still hidden?

    I've got ideas of how/why in my head, but I know those ideas at least are either my own creation or fandom inspired.
     
  15. Toujourss Pur

    Toujourss Pur First Year

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Spain
    High Score:
    0
    If I remember correctly, it had to be broken, because Hermione could see the house as well, and basically whoever came there to sign the memorial text (and the person who put it there). Unless that text wasn't exactly where the house was, which I don't remember. Harry should be able to see the house anyway, and as it is his perspective, I can be wrong.
     
  16. CheddarTrek

    CheddarTrek Set Phasers to Melt Moderator DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,954
    Location:
    Mississippi
    Okay, so I'm missing something... you said...

    But since Cursed Child takes place AFTER Deathly Hallows, it should be visible, right?

    Ooh, or wait, so this is because of the time travel and you're talking about a point BEFORE canon started? When it should be hidden?

    Time travel complicates discussions, my bad if it's that simple.
     
  17. Toujourss Pur

    Toujourss Pur First Year

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Spain
    High Score:
    0
    Yeah, when they travel back in time to 1981, everyone (I think, but I'm almost certain) who has travelled back is able to see the house, which shouldn't be possible unless the Fidelius has that weakness I mentioned before.
     
  18. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    You're right on both counts. All of them were able to see the house, which really shouldn't have been possible since Voldemort hadn't attacked yet (if I recall correctly). Although, that begs the question: would the Fidelius have failed because the secret was revealed by the secret keeper? Or is it simply sloppy writing causing sloppy mistakes?
     
  19. Shinysavage

    Shinysavage Madman With A Box Prestige

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Location:
    UK
    High Score:
    2,296
    Ripple-Effect Proof Memory is a thing, and it seems reasonable to apply that here. The Fidelius was pretty clearly broken completely, and that's suggested pretty much from the very start of the series, when in the first chapter you've got McGonagall and Dumbledore mentioning Godric's Hollow by name, and Hagrid and Sirius going there in person. Doubtless Sirius knew the secret anyway, and probably Dumbledore did as well, but I'm not sure McGonagall and Hagrid would have been considered 'need to know' candidates. Doesn't seem like a plot-hole to me.

    Nor, for that matter, does Albus kissing Hermione, or Ron giving Albus a love potion. Bad/stupid/weird/immoral, perhaps, but not plot-holes.

    Also, there isn't a boggart anywhere in the play, that I recall, and the pigeon thing is mentioned solely in conversation at the end, where it's clearly presented as an irrational phobia. Stupid, yes, but not a plot-hole.
     
  20. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    So, majority of what I would consider plot-holes are just examples of the stupid/immoral/bad occurrences in the play. Okay, makes sense with the corresponding explanations. What'd you consider plot-holes?