1. Hey Guest, welcome back to DLP

    As you can see, we've changed our look. We've migrated from vBulletin to the Xenforo forum system. There may be issues or missing functionality, if you find anything or have feedback, please check out the new Xenforo Migration Feedback forum.

    Our dark ("Dark Lord Potter") theme is under heavy development. We also have a light ("Light Lord Potter") theme for those happier with a light background and darker text.

    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Hey Guest! Are you any good at cooking? Got a favourite recipe that you love to cook or bring out to impress that special someone? Why not share it! A new forum called The Burrow has opened and it's all about homemaking!

What Makes a Good Sidekick?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Lyndon Eye, Mar 31, 2008.

  1. Lyndon Eye

    Lyndon Eye Minister of Magic DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,345
    Location:
    North Africa
    Many of our favorite heroes have sidekicks.

    Batman had Robin.

    Tom Sawyer had Huckleberry Finn.

    Sherlock Holmes had Watson.


    And of course, Harry Potter had Ron, and to a lesser (or greater, depending on your definition) extent, Hermione.


    Just some food for thought:

    -What makes a good sidekick?

    -What role is the sidekick supposed to fulfill?

    -Why do the villains never have sidekicks and only henchmen/servants?

    -And (most relevant to DLP): Can Ron Weasley be considered a good sidekick? Can Hermione Granger?
     
  2. Link

    Link Order Member DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    845
    Location:
    China
    I'd say that a good sidekick is someone who is not a redhead.

    Nah, Ron Weasley is a good sidekick, I think, despite the fact I dislike him. He's stupid, jaleous, backstabbing kind of friend, but can be useful once in a while. Like... helping Harry mastering the Cruciatus Curse.
     
  3. afrojack

    afrojack Chief Warlock DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,591
    Location:
    Southron California
    The role of the sidekick is to show the great enduring friendship of the hero as opposed to the utilitarian, solitary emotional disposition of the villain. The villain is alone because he has no love, and the point of sidekicks is to demonstrate the hero's. Also, perhaps to show power in unity, because the only way to beat a Powerful Dark Lord is to team up. Unfair bastards, lol.
     
  4. Narion

    Narion Slug Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    185
    Loyalty and competence, mainly. Loyalty is an obvious necessity in a follower of any importance, and competence is necessary for a follower to be important.

    Several. A sidekick can be a useful foil for ideas, or source of otherwise unusual information. There's also the potential uses in combat, and in sensitive duties that the central character is too busy to handle.

    Largely because villains don't establish a stable power structure. They're always looking to advance, and they'll do whatever it takes to do so. A sidekick requires trust, and it's not possible to trust someone who'll stab you in the back at the first opportunity. That said, there are villains who do have people that they trust to such an extent, but they still keep the relationship distant, so it lacks the personal quality that hero-sidekick relationships have.

    A lot of the issue here is that a stable relationship almost always involves a sharing of power in some sense or another, and most villains are absolute dictators.

    Neither can. Ron is disloyal and incompetent, requires an excessive investment of time for a return that is modest at best and poor in average circumstances, and will abandon Harry without a second thought. Hermione is too focused on herself to be a suitable sidekick, and wants Harry to be dependent on her, which could be a fatal fault, with impacts potentially extending to affect the entire wizarding world. Neither even qualifies as a good friend, much less a good sidekick.

    Narion
     
  5. Banner

    Banner Dark Lady

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    A REALLY good sidekick isn't really a sidekick at all -
    1) He's intelligent, with a contrasting viewpoint and a type of education that makes him a good sounding board for ideas
    2) His morals are functionally close to those of the hero (not necessarily identical)
    3) Neither a whiner, or unreasonably optimistic.
    4) Has his own useful skill set, complementary to those of the hero
    5) Self-starting, and well-capable of independant action.
    6) NOT a bootlicker, yes-man, or trained seal.
    7) He's loyal, either to the hero or to the hero's cause.

    He enhances and complements the hero's strengths, covers the hero's failings.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2008
  6. Amerision

    Amerision Galactic Sheep Emperor DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,541
    Location:
    The Gardens in the Desert Sand
    The most important trait a sidekick should exhibit is predictability. Communication is not always possible - especially when you need it most.

    Because of this, knowing that you can rely on the sidekick to decide things a certain way makes cooperation much easier.
     
  7. Seratin

    Seratin Proudmander Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,263
    Location:
    Dún na ngall
    High Score:
    3,792
    If the main hero ever loses a fight (how many times does that happen in batman?) he can go drinking and take out his woes on said unsuspecting sidekick.

    I lol'd at the thought of a drunk batman slurring his words and brandishing a whiskey bottle at Robin while calling for Batgirl to make herself useful and get the bed warmed up. :D
     
  8. White Rabbit

    White Rabbit Hippity Hoppity DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Speaking of Batman, the main reason his relationship with the Robins was because of the hot pants. Not because of the whole gay aspect, but because of the superiority he felt from demeaning Robin. And since Batman makes Robin feel inferior, he automatically puts himself in a postion of power in Robin's mind. Thus having a loyal sidekick, who's open to becoming like Batman, but always holding him up to mythical proportions.
     
  9. Banner

    Banner Dark Lady

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,668
    Location:
    Virginia, USA


    And then one day, Robin went out alone in the Batmobile, and met a Very Friendly girl, who took him out dancing and drinking, and didn't even insist on paying, unlike all the "liberated" women he had met before. After they gyrated on the dance floor for a while, she led him by the hand back to the parking lot, where she showed him just HOW inconvenient bucket seats can be.
    Robin got back to the mansion well after dawn. The next evening, he looked in the mirror and decided to change his image.
    Thus, Nightwing was born.

    Boy was the Bat PISSED.
     
  10. White Rabbit

    White Rabbit Hippity Hoppity DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Lol. Nah Batman kicked his ass to the curb. Little Robin was just getting too old for his tastes. That's the real reason Dick Grayson decided to become Nightwing.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2008
  11. Darius

    Darius 13/m/box

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,582
    Location:
    The Octagon - Say that to my face and not online m
    ...I don't get how Ron is disloyal besides the one instance in GoF - he was 15.
     
  12. Blaise

    Blaise Golden Patronus

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,195
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.
    Batman had all sorts of sidekicks, really...though I suppose only Robin got to ride shotgun in the Batmobile.

    Back on topic: I think that a drive to reach the same goals as the hero, yet a firm knowledge and acceptance of their role as second fiddle, makes for a good sidekick. I
     
  13. Demons In The Night

    Demons In The Night Chief Warlock

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    Florida
    You didn't read DH? He pulled another bitch move, and he was I believe 17 at the time. Granted, he did return to them eventually, but he proved once again he is a fickle friend that lets his emotions get the best of him, and is capable of deserting his best friends for selfish reasons. Sure he made up later, but a true friend sticks with you through the highs and the lows, not doing what Ron did.

    Ron is a bitch plain and simple. A mediocre, jealous, petulant, inferiority complex having, mostly useless bitch at that. He does nothing for Harry but waste his time and distract him from what's important.
     
  14. Darius

    Darius 13/m/box

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,582
    Location:
    The Octagon - Say that to my face and not online m
    No I didn't actually. Oops :eek:
     
  15. Lyndon Eye

    Lyndon Eye Minister of Magic DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,345
    Location:
    North Africa
    True, true. But isn't that what makes him a good sidekick?

    I think one of the most important functions of the sidekick is to act as a foil for the hero. For instance, Sherlock Holmes' brilliance wouldn't be so amazing if we didn't have Watson's mediocrity to compare it to (hmm... just another thought, perhaps a good sidekick just needs to be average? Like us? That way, it emphasizes the uniqueness of the hero).

    Ron, if nothing else, certainly highlights Harry's qualities. As lazy as Harry is, Ron makes him look like a workaholic. As rude as Harry may be at times, Ron makes him look like a saint.

    Indeed, I'd argue that if the sidekick ever overshadowed the hero (*cough* Hermione), then the author didn't do a very good job with creating the role.
     
  16. Narion

    Narion Slug Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    185
    The difficulty with that argument is that while the internal comparisons are accurate, Harry is the average one, and Ron is just nigh-useless. Sure, when Ron is around, Harry looks better, but Ron only drags Harry down in the end, which is the exact opposite of what a sidekick does. Ron isn't the sidekick, he's the utter failure that exists to show just how comparatively awesome the hero is.

    Watson, it should be noted, was likely more talented than most police inspectors, or at least on a fairly similar level to them - it's just that Holmes outshone him so very much, in addition to being the very driving force of his much more limited talents. In addition, he had talents of his own, independent of Holmes. If anything, this just further emphasized Holmes' ability.

    Narion
     
  17. Lyndon Eye

    Lyndon Eye Minister of Magic DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,345
    Location:
    North Africa
    And my argument is that the primary role of the sidekick is to emphasize the good qualities of the hero. Which would make Ron the perfect sidekick.



    Again, Watson's main role is to make us appreciate just how great Holmes is. We, the reader, are on Watson's level and can relate to him. But Holmes, the hero, is miles above that.

    The sidekick isn't meant to be useful, I don't think (Ron certainly isn't, in the conventional sense of the word. And Hermione's too useful, which prompts many to dislike her as a character, which is why her character doesn't make a very good sidekick). From a literary standpoint, the primary role of the sidekick is just to provide a contrast to our hero and a comparison that emphasizes said hero's heroicism.
     
  18. White Rabbit

    White Rabbit Hippity Hoppity DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Ron hinder's instead of helps. Yes, he makes Harry look better than average, but a sidekick's main objective is to help the hero. Sure, the sidekick can goof up a few times, but he needs to be of some use.
     
  19. Philly Homer

    Philly Homer What you call elephant cum I call mouthwash

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    578
    Location:
    Look at the name, it should be obvious.
    If it’s a female sidekick we are talking about, then she better be fucking fantastic in bed, otherwise she is worthless. In fact the only competent female sidekick, which I can recall is Mystique, but she is never completely loyal to one person, so my original point of female sidekick being worthless, unless she is great at giving head, sticks.

    As for Ron, I don’t think I can elaborate further on this;

     
  20. Viper

    Viper Fourth Year

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    134
    QFT.

    The best sidekick, according to me, would be Samwise Gamgee. He's loyal, helpful and everything I look for in a sidekick.

    *Completely off topic*
    Homer, did Flair lose or win at Wrestlemania?